“That risk has been estimated at about 1 in 2 or 3 million uses.” “There is a small theoretical risk with a perfect probe landing in a very slender person and TASER warns of this,” Tuttle said. In the company’s view, there are no “confirmed” cases of Taser-induced cardiac arrest, or electrocution, he said. “Taser weapons are the most thoroughly studied and safest force option available to law enforcement,” spokesman Steve Tuttle said in an email. The company says its weapon, used more than pepper spray or the baton, has been fully vetted. Two decades on, a million Tasers have been deployed around the world. Years later, when a prototype Taser sent a cop’s heart racing at four times its normal rate, the company waited 18 months for the episode to come to light. As indications of cardiac risk emerged in its own studies, Taser took months or years to disclose details and issue relevant warnings.Ī decade after it happened, Smith acknowledged, contrary to his earlier statement, that one of Taser's early test animals did suffer a potentially lethal heart disruption, according to a deposition reviewed by Reuters. “It was woefully inadequate and would not have met any scientific standards for testing,” Zipes said in an interview.īecause Tasers sold to police are unregulated, the company has wide latitude to decide what it tells them. “That certainly was not FDA quality,” said Dr Douglas Zipes, an Indiana University School of Medicine cardiac rhythm expert who has studied the effect of electricity on the heart for more than 40 years and has testified against Taser in wrongful death suits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |